4.6 Article

Mining the Factors Driving the Evolution of the Pit Mud Microbiome under the Impact of Long-Term Production o Strong-Flavor Baijiu

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00885-21

关键词

Chinese strong-flavor baijiu; different-aged pit mud; microbial biomass; prokaryotic communities; volatile metabolites

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Programme of China [2018YFC1603800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901658]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M671407]
  4. National First-Class Discipline Program of Light Industry Technology and Engineering [LITE2018-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flavor of strong-flavor baijiu (SFB) is closely related to the microbes in the mud cellar, with metabolites produced by microbes in pit mud being crucial for the unique flavor of SFB. Experimental findings show a positive correlation between the quality of SFB and the age of the cellar. The main metabolites in the production of SFB, such as lactate and acetate, play a key role in modulating the pit mud microbiome.
The mud cellar creates a unique microenvironment for the fermentation of strong-flavor baijiu (SFB). Recent research and long-term practice have highlighted the key roles of microbes inhabiting pit mud in the formation of SFB's characteristic flavor. A positive correlation between the quality of SFB and cellar age was extracted from practice; however, the evolutionary patterns of pit mud microbiome and driving factors remain unclear. Here, based on the variation regularity analysis of microbial community structure and metabolites of samples from cellars of different ages (similar to 30/100/300 years), we further investigated the effects of lactate and acetate (main microbial metabolites in fermented grains) on modulating the pit mud microbiome. Esters (50.3% to 64.5%) dominated the volatile compounds identified in pit mud, and contents of the four typical acids (lactate, hexanoate, acetate, and butyrate) increased with cellar age. Bacteria (9.5 to 10.4 log(10) [Ig] copies/g) and archaea (8.3 to 9.1 lg copies/g) mainly constituted pit mud microbiota, respectively dominated by Clostridia (39.7% to 81.2%) and Methanomicrobia (32.8% to 92.9%). An upward trend with cellar age characterized the relative and absolute abundance of the most predominant bacterial and archaeal genera, Caproiciproducens and Methanosarcina. Correlation analysis revealed significantly (P < 0.05) positive relationships between the two genera and major metabolites. Anaerobic fermentation with acetate and lactate as carbon sources enhanced the enrichment of Clostridia, and furthermore, the relative abundance of Caproiciproducens (40.9%) significantly increased after 15-day fed-batch fermentation with lactate compared with the initial pit mud (0.22%). This work presents a directional evolutionary pattern of pit mud microbial consortia and provides an alternative way to accelerate the enrichment of functional microbes. IMPORTANCE The solid-state anaerobic fermentation in a mud cellar is the most typical feature of strong-flavor baijiu (SFB). Metabolites produced by microbes inhabiting pit mud are crucial to create the unique flavor of SFB. Accordingly, craftspeople have always highlighted the importance of the pit mud microbiome and concluded by centuries of practice that the production rate of high-quality baijiu increases with cellar age. To deepen the understanding of the pit mud microbiome, we determined the microbial community and metabolites of different-aged pit mud, inferred the main functional groups, and explored the forces driving the microbial community evolution through metagenomic, metabolomic, and multivariate statistical analyses. The results showed that the microbial consortia of pit mud presented a regular and directional evolutionary pattern under the impact of continuous batch-tobatch brewing activities. This work provides insight into the key roles of the pit mud microbiome in SFB production and supports the production optimization of highquality pit mud.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据