4.6 Review Book Chapter

Are Terrestrial Biological Invasions Different in the Tropics?

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-012021-095454

关键词

latitudinal gradient; biotic invasion; biotic resistance; species characteristics; ecological impacts; biosecurity

资金

  1. Operational Programme Research, Development and Education [EVA4.0, CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803]
  2. AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology of the University Paris Saclay
  3. AlienScenario project of BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum
  4. NTU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biological invasion research in tropical regions has been lacking attention but is increasingly being recognized and reinforced; studies have found little difference in invasibility and impact factors between tropical and temperate regions, with propagule pressure and adaptation to disturbances promoting invasions in both regions; there is an urgent need for increased investment and regional cooperation in the study, prevention, and management of biological invasions in the tropics.
Most biological invasion literature-including syntheses and meta-analyses and the resulting theory-is reported from temperate regions, drawing only minimally from the tropics except for some island systems. The lack of attention to invasions in the tropics results from and reinforces the assumption that tropical ecosystems, and especially the continental tropics, are more resistant to invasions. We have critically assessed biological invasions in the tropics and compared them with temperate regions, finding relatively weak evidence that tropical and temperate regions differ in their invasibility and in the traits that determine invader success and impacts. Propagule pressure and the traits that promote adaptation to disturbances (e.g., high fecundity or fast growth rates) are generally favorable to invasions in both tropical and temperate regions. We emphasize the urgent need for greater investment and regional cooperation in the study, prevention, and management of biological invasions in the tropics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据