4.6 Review Book Chapter

The Form and Function of PIEZO2

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL 90, 2021
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 507-534

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-081720-023244

关键词

PIEZO2; mechanosensation; mechanotransduction; somatosensation; touch; proprioception; ion channel

资金

  1. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Intramural Research Program through the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM (HEAL) Initiative
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM (HEAL) Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanosensation is crucial for detecting dynamic mechanical stimuli such as pressure, stretch, and shear stress, with a breakthrough in 2010 being the discovery of mechanically gated ion channels called PIEZOs. The past decade of research has provided valuable information about the functional roles and mechanisms of these molecules, particularly PIEZO2, leading to a better understanding of touch and other types of mechanosensation.
Mechanosensation is the ability to detect dynamic mechanical stimuli (e.g., pressure, stretch, and shear stress) and is essential for a wide variety of processes, including our sense of touch on the skin. How touch is detected and transduced at the molecular level has proved to be one of the great mysteries of sensory biology. A major breakthrough occurred in 2010 with the discovery of a family of mechanically gated ion channels that were coined PIEZOs. The last 10 years of investigation have provided a wealth of information about the functional roles and mechanisms of these molecules. Here we focus on PIEZO2, one of the two PIEZO proteins found in humans and other mammals. We review how work at the molecular, cellular, and systems levels over the past decade has transformed our understanding of touch and led to unexpected insights into other types of mechanosensation beyond the skin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据