4.6 Article

Concordance of Treatment Effect: An Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 113, 期 4, 页码 1172-1182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.05.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. STS through the STS Access and Publications Task Force under the Workforce on Research Develop-ment and the Workforce on National Databases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared survival rates of contemporary left ventricular assist device technologies using real-world data and various analytic approaches. The results supported the superiority of CF-FML over CF-HL in terms of 1-year survival, validating previous observations made by the STS Intermacs Registry.
BACKGROUND The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Intermacs Registry represents a real-world data source of durable, left ventricular assist devices that can address knowledge gaps not informed through randomized clinical trials. We sought to compare survival with contemporary left ventricular assist device technologies using multiple analytic approaches to assess concordance of treatment effects and to validate prior STS Intermacs observations. METHODS Patients (>= 19 years of age) enrolled into STS Intermacs between August 2017 and June 2019 were stratified by device type (continuous flow, centrifugal left ventricular assist device with hybrid levitation [CF-HL] or full magnetic levitation [CF-FML]). The primary outcome was 1-year survival assessed by 3 statistical methodologies (multivariable regression, propensity score matching, and instrumental variable analysis). RESULTS Of 4448 patients, 2012 (45.2%) received the CF-HL and 2436 (54.8%) received the CF-FML. One-year survival for the CF-FML was 88% vs 79% for the CF-HL (overall P < .001), with ahazard ratio for mortality of 3.18 for the CF-HL (P <.0001) after risk adjustment. With propensity score matching (n [1400 each cohort), 1-year survival was 87% for the CF-FML vs 80% for the CF HL, with ahazard ratio of 3.20 for mortality with the CF-HL (P < .0001) after risk adjustment. With an instrumental variable analysis, the probability of receiving the CF-HL was associated with a hazard ratio of 3.11 (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Statistical methodology using propensity score matching and instrumental variable analysis increased the robustness of observations derived from real-world data and demonstrates the feasibility of performing comparative effectiveness research using STS Intermacs. These analyses provide additional evidence supporting a survival benefit of the CF-FML vs CF-HL. (c) 2022 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据