4.7 Review

Persistent Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction and Strategies for Mitigation

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 6099-6108

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10487-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Racial disparities in breast reconstruction for African American women exist in various aspects, including reconstruction rates, physician referral patterns, patient knowledge of reconstructive options, and risk factors for complications. Targeted research and strategies can help improve these disparities.
For many women, breast reconstruction is an essential component of the breast cancer care continuum after mastectomy. Despite postmastectomy breast reconstruction now being a standard of care, numerous studies over the past decade have documented persistent racial disparities in breast reconstruction rates, physician referral patterns, and patient knowledge of their reconstructive options. These disparities have disproportionately impacted women of color-most specifically, African American women. Recent data have revealed racial differences in patient comorbidities, informed decision-making satisfaction, and clinical outcomes after breast reconstruction. Explicitly, African American women have significantly more risk factors for complications and less baseline knowledge regarding reconstructive options than white women. With a recent heightened attention focused on social determinants of health, studies designed to improve these racial differences have demonstrated promising results through educational outreach to underserved communities, implementation of tailored legislation promoting inclusion, diversity, and equity, and encouragement of additional recruitment of ethnically underrepresented-in-medicine surgeons. This study uses a targeted review of the literature to provide a summary of racial disparities in breast reconstruction for African American women, with our perspective on opportunities for improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据