相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens
Keiichiro Mori et al.
EJSO (2021)
Gleason score 5+3=8 (grade group 4) prostate cancer-a rare occurrence with contemporary grading
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
HUMAN PATHOLOGY (2020)
Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Scores: Evaluation of Determinants in a Large-Scale Study of Patients Undergoing RARP in Belgium
C. Soenens et al.
PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH (2020)
Most Gleason 8 Biopsies are Downgraded at Prostatectomy-Does 4+4=7?
Ted Gansler et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2018)
Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified system
Jonathan Epstein
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2018)
Are all grade group 4 prostate cancers created equal? Implications for the applicability of the novel grade grouping
Giorgio Gandaglia et al.
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS (2017)
Significant prognostic difference between Grade Group 4 and 5 in the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Grading System for High Grade Prostate Cancer with Bone Metastasis
Yasutaka Yamada et al.
PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL (2017)
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
Gleason score 5+3=8 prostate cancer: much more like Gleason score 9?
Brandon A. Mahal et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2016)
Validation of the novel International Society of Urological Pathology 2014 five-tier Gleason grade grouping: biochemical recurrence rates for 3+5 disease may be overestimated
Roderick C. N. van den Bergh et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2016)
Gleason Score 3+5 or 5+3 versus 4+4 Prostate Cancer: The Risk of Death
Mai Anh Huynh et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens
Guido Sauter et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Outcome of Gleason 3+5=8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4+4=8
Nicholas Harding-Jackson et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Gleason 5+4 Has Worse Oncological and Pathological Outcomes Compared with Gleason 4+5: Significance of Gleason 5 Pattern
Sey Kiat Lim et al.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2013)
Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system
Phillip M. Pierorazio et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2013)
Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study
Rune Kvale et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2009)
GLEASON PATTERN 5 PROSTATE CANCER: FURTHER STRATIFICATION OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK DISEASE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RANDOMIZED TRIALS
Akash Nanda et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS (2009)
Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy
Michael Muentener et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2008)
Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and 5 predicts survival after radical prostatectomy
Liang Cheng et al.
CANCER (2007)
Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: A proposal for standardized definition
Andrew J. Stephenson et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2006)
Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation
Felix K. -H. Chun et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2006)
The combined percentage of gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy
L Cheng et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2005)
Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate
PA Humphrey
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2004)
Predictive value of primary Gleason pattern 4 in patients with Gleason score 7 tumours treated with radical prostatectomy
SM Khoddami et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2004)
分享论文
