4.7 Article

A Multiple-Center Nomogram to Predict Pneumonectomy Complication Risk for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 561-569

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10504-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program [PX2021060]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81670089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A nomogram was developed to predict postoperative complication risks after pneumonectomy in NSCLC patients, showing a high discrimination power.
Objective This study aimed to construct a nomogram to quantitatively predict pneumonectomy complication risks for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods Data from 1052 NSCLC patients who underwent pneumonectomy were retrospectively retrieved from the databases of three thoracic centers. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate postoperative morbidity predictors. Clinical parameters and operative features were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram to predict the risk of postoperative complications was constructed using bootstrap resampling. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to estimate the discrimination power for the nomogram. Results A total of 212 patients (20.2%) had major complications. After regression analysis, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, male sex, and right-sided pneumonectomy were identified and entered into the nomogram. The nomogram showed a robust discrimination, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.753 (95% confidence interval 0.604-0.818). The calibration curves for the probability of postoperative complications showed optimal agreement between the nomogram and the actual probability. Conclusions Based on preoperative data, we developed a nomogram for predicting complication risks after pneumonectomy. This model may be helpful for thoracic surgeons in selecting appropriate patients for adopting prophylactic measures after surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据