4.4 Article

AGGREGATED PAIRWISE CLASSIFICATION OF ELASTIC PLANAR SHAPES

期刊

ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 619-637

出版社

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS-IMS
DOI: 10.1214/21-AOAS1452

关键词

Dimension reduction; LDA; pairwise classification; projection point; QDA; registration

资金

  1. NSF [CCF 1839252, R37 CA214955, DMS 1613110, DMS 1613054, CCF 1740761]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shape classification is a key task in various fields, but the inherently infinite-dimensional and curved nature of shape data may require novel approaches. Therefore, methods such as using the square-root velocity function of curves for shape description, working with tangent spaces of shape manifolds to reduce dimensionality, and combining pairwise classifiers to improve misclassification rates may be necessary.
The classification of shapes is of great interest in diverse areas ranging from medical imaging to computer vision and beyond. While many statistical frameworks have been developed for the classification problem, most are strongly tied to early formulations of the problem with an object to be classified described as a vector in a relatively low-dimensional Euclidean space. Statistical shape data have two main properties that suggest a need for a novel approach: (i) shapes are inherently infinite-dimensional with strong dependence among the positions of nearby points, and (ii) shape space is not Euclidean but is fundamentally curved. To accommodate these features of the data, we work with the square-root velocity function of the curves to provide a useful formal description of the shape, pass to tangent spaces of the manifold of shapes at projection points (which effectively separate shapes for pairwise classification in the training data) and use principal components within these tangent spaces to reduce dimensionality. We illustrate the impact of the projection point and choice of subspace on the misclassification rate with a novel method of combining pairwise classifiers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据