4.6 Article

Assessing the nutritional quality of fungal treated wheat straw: Compounds formed after treatment with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora and Lentinula edodes

期刊

ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 276, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114924

关键词

Selective lignin degradation; pH; Mycotoxins; Organic acids; Metabolites

资金

  1. Victam Foundation
  2. Deka Foundation
  3. Forfarmers through the University Fund Wageningen
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. Wageningen University Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass by white-rot fungi can affect the nutritional value and acceptance of the biomass by ruminants. Increases in mycelium content resulted in significant decreases in cellulose and lignin in wheat straw incubated with different fungi. No common mycotoxins were detected in the wheat straw after 8 weeks of fungal incubation.
A variety of secondary metabolites are formed and compounds released during the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass by white-rot fungi that can affect the nutritional value and acceptance of the biomass by ruminants. Changes in pH, ergosterol content, fibre and metabolites composition of wheat straw (WS) incubated with either Ceriporiopsis subvermispora or Lentinula edodes for up to 8 weeks were investigated. With increases in mycelium content, significant decreases in absolute amount of hemicellulose, acid detergent lignin and, to a lesser extent, cellulose were observed in both fungal treatments. Acidification mainly occurred within the first four weeks of incubation, coinciding with the largest changes in metabolites profile. Diverse compounds, including organic acids and soluble sugars increased or decreased with C. subvermispora and L. edodes treatment. None of the thirty-four common mycotoxins analyzed were detected in WS after 8 weeks of fungal incubation. These results provide important information for application of fungal treated WS that might affect animal acceptance and performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据