4.5 Article

Who is there? Captive western gorillas distinguish human voices based on familiarity and nature of previous interactions

期刊

ANIMAL COGNITION
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 217-228

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01543-y

关键词

Heterospecific vocal recognition; Ape communication; Gorilla gorilla; Heterospecific eavesdropping

资金

  1. University of Georgia
  2. Experiment Crowdsource Platform

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability of social animals to recognize conspecifics by their acoustic signals is crucial for discrimination between familiar and unfamiliar individuals and facilitating interactions. In a study with western gorillas, it was found that they responded more to the voices of unfamiliar and familiar-negative individuals, indicating their ability to recognize human voices based on familiarity and possibly the nature of their relationship. Future research should investigate if this behavior is also observed in wild settings with less intense interactions with humans.
The ability to recognize conspecifics by their acoustic signals is of crucial importance to social animals, especially where visibility is limited, because it allows for discrimination between familiar and unfamiliar individuals and facilitates associations with and the avoidance of particular conspecifics. Animals may also benefit from an ability to recognize and use the information coded into the auditory signals of other species. Companion species such as dogs, cats, and horses are able to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar human voices; however, whether this ability is widespread across vertebrates is still unknown. Using playback experiments, we tested whether western gorillas living at Zoo Atlanta were able to discriminate between the voices of subgroups of people: i.e., unfamiliar individuals, familiar individuals with whom the gorillas had positive interactions, and familiar individuals with whom they had negative interactions. Gorillas responded significantly more often (longer gazing duration, higher gazing frequency, shorter latency, and larger number of distress behaviors) to the voices of unfamiliar and familiar-negative individuals than to those of familiar-positive individuals, indicating that they recognized the voices of subgroup of people based on familiarity and possibly the nature of the relationship with them. Future studies should determine whether this is also the case in the wild, where interspecific associations with humans are less intense than they are in captive settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据