4.6 Article

Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolates from broiler chicken and slaughter house environment in India

期刊

ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 199-207

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2021.1953514

关键词

Campylobacter; broiler; antimicrobial resistance; resistance mechanisms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of antimicrobial resistant Campylobacter spp. in broiler chicken samples and slaughter house settings presents a significant threat to public health, especially with the high occurrence of multidrug resistance. This calls for the prudent use of antimicrobials.
Campylobacteriosis is among the most frequently reported foodborne zoonoses. A total of 848 samples were screened for Campylobacter spp. and occurrence was found to be 8.7%, 2.3% and 1.65% in broiler cecum samples, chicken meat samples and slaughter house environment swabs, respectively. High level of antimicrobial resistance was found against tetracycline (64.1%), doxycycline (54.4%), ampicillin (46.6%), nalidixic acid (42.7%), kanamycin (35.9%), and ciprofloxacin (33.33%). Resistance to co-amoxiclav (19.4%) and erythromycin (21.4%) was less common. The MAR index of the isolates was in the range of 0.11-0.78. Multi-drug resistance was observed in 54.4% of the isolates, with 53.2% C. jejuni and 55.3% C. coli isolates found resistant against three or more classes of antimicrobials. Presence of mutations in gyrA and 23S rRNA genes was investigated, which revealed that all the fluoroquinolone resistant isolates possessed Thr-86-Ile point mutation, whereas only 68% of erythromycin resistant isolates had A2075G mutation. The tetO gene was present in 91.7% tetracycline resistant isolates and bla(OXA-61) gene was detected in 97.9% of the ampicillin resistant isolates. The occurrence of antimicrobial resistant Campylobacter spp. in broiler chicken samples and slaughter house settings is a public health risk and calls for judicial use of antimicrobials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据