4.8 Article

Epitaxial Nickel Ferrocyanide Stabilizes Jahn-Teller Distortions of Manganese Ferrocyanide for Sodium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 34, 页码 18519-18526

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202106240

关键词

electron microscopy; Jahn-Teller distortion; lattice strain; Prussian Blue; sodium-ion batteries

资金

  1. Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA), ARENA R&D Programme, Hong Cheng Electric Power Company
  2. McNair Technology Co. Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study stabilized the structure of manganese-based Prussian Blue by designing an epitaxial surface layer, improving the cycling stability of sodium-ion battery cathode materials. The new synthesis method is simple and feasible, and can maintain good electrochemical performance at high rates.
Manganese-based Prussian Blue, Na2-delta Mn[Fe(CN)(6)] (MnPB), is a good candidate for sodium-ion battery cathode materials due to its high capacity. However, it suffers from severe capacity decay during battery cycling due to the destabilizing Jahn-Teller distortions it undergoes as Mn2+ is oxidized to Mn3+. Herein, the structure is stabilized by a thin epitaxial surface layer of nickel-based Prussian Blue (Na2-delta Ni[Fe(CN)(6)]). The one-pot synthesis relies on a chelating agent with an unequal affinity for Mn2+ and Ni2+ ions, which prevents Ni2+ from reacting until the Mn2+ is consumed. This is a new and simpler synthesis of core-shell materials, which usually needs several steps. The material has an electrochemical capacity of 93 mA h g(-1), of which it retains 96 % after 500 charge-discharge cycles (vs. 37 % for MnPB). Its rate capability is also remarkable: at 4 A g(-1) (ca. 55 C) it can reversibly store 70 mA h g(-1), which is also reflected in its diffusion coefficient of ca. 10(-8) cm(2) s(-1). The epitaxial outer layer appears to exert an anisotropic strain on the inner layer, preventing the Jahn-Teller distortions it normally undergoes during de-sodiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据