4.8 Article

Halogen Bonding Tetraphenylethene Anion Receptors: Anion-Induced Emissive Aggregates and Photoswitchable Recognition

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 35, 页码 19442-19450

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202107748

关键词

aggregation-induced emission; anion recognition; fluorescence; halogen bonding; photoswitchable receptors

资金

  1. Royal Society [RGF\EA\181007]
  2. EPSRC [EP/N509711/1, EP/R513295/1]
  3. University of Oxford
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. Oxford University Press Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of TPE derivatives functionalized with perfluoroaryl iodo-triazole halogen bond donors have been reported for anion recognition. These derivatives form luminescent nanoscale aggregates driven by anion coordination, serving as a powerful sensory mechanism for parts per billion concentration chloride sensing. The geometric isomers of these derivatives also act as unprecedented photoswitchable XB donor anion receptors, with the photostationary state composition modulated by the presence of a coordinating halide anion.
A series of tetraphenylethene (TPE) derivatives functionalized with highly potent electron-deficient perfluoroaryl iodo-triazole halogen bond (XB) donors for anion recognition are reported. (HNMR)-H-1 titration experiments, fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering measurements, TEM imaging and X-ray crystal structure analysis reveal that the tetra-substituted halogen bonding receptor forms luminescent nanoscale aggregates, the formation of which is driven by XB-mediated anion coordination. This anion-coordination-induced aggregation effect serves as a powerful sensory mechanism, capable of luminescence chloride sensing at parts per billion concentration. Furthermore, the doubly substituted geometric isomers act as unprecedented photoswitchable XB donor anion receptors, where the composition of the photostationary state can be modulated by the presence of a coordinating halide anion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据