4.8 Article

A Desolvation-Free Sodium Dual-Ion Chemistry for High Power Density and Extremely Low Temperature

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 44, 页码 23858-23862

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202110501

关键词

desolvation process; fast kinetics; low-temperature performance; Sodium dual-ion battery

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFE0201702]
  2. Shanghai Science AMP
  3. Technology Committee [19DZ2270100, 19DZ1205500]
  4. Shanghai Education Development Foundation
  5. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [19CG01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel desolvation-free sodium dual-ion battery (SDIB) with artificial graphite anode and polytriphenylamine cathode shows exceptional performance in fast charging, low-temperature operation, high power density, and wide temperature range. This advanced battery system opens up new possibilities for designing energy storage devices in the future.
The development of conventional rechargeable batteries based on intercalation chemistry in the fields of fast charge and low temperature is generally hindered by the sluggish cation-desolvation process at the electrolyte/electrode interphase. To address this issue, a novel desolvation-free sodium dual-ion battery (SDIB) has been proposed by using artificial graphite (AG) as anode and polytriphenylamine (PTPAn) as cathode. Combining the cation solvent co-intercalation and anion storage chemistry, such a SDIB operated with ether-based electrolyte can intrinsically eliminate the sluggish desolvation process. Hence, it can exhibit an extremely fast kinetics of 10 Ag-1 (corresponding to 100C-rate) with a high capacity retention of 45 %. Moreover, the desolvation-free mechanism endows the battery with 61 % of its room-temperature capacity at an ultra-low temperature of -70 degrees C. This advanced battery system will open a door for designing energy storage devices that require high power density and a wide operational temperature range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据