4.8 Article

High-Affinity Dimeric Aptamers Enable the Rapid Electrochemical Detection of Wild-Type and B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 in Unprocessed Saliva

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 45, 页码 24266-24274

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202110819

关键词

aptamers; COVID-19; electrochemical biosensors; rapid tests; saliva

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) [446898]
  2. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) [20339]
  3. Ontario Ministry for Research and Innovation (ORF-RE) [RE07-045]
  4. Weston Foundation Microbiome Initiative
  5. McMaster University COVID-19 Research Fund
  6. CIHR New Investigator Award
  7. Ontario Research Fund Early Researcher Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a simple and rapid saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen test using a newly developed DNA aptamer, which showed high sensitivity and specificity in detecting the wildtype virus and its Alpha and Delta variants.
We report a simple and rapid saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen test that utilizes a newly developed dimeric DNA aptamer, denoted as DSA1N5, that specifically recognizes the spike proteins of the wildtype virus and its Alpha and Delta variants with dissociation constants of 120, 290 and 480 pM, respectively, and binds pseudotyped lentiviruses expressing the wildtype and alpha trimeric spike proteins with affinity constants of 2.1 pM and 2.3 pM, respectively. To develop a highly sensitive test, DSA1N5 was immobilized onto gold electrodes to produce an electrochemical impedance sensor, which was capable of detecting 1000 viral particles per mL in 1:1 diluted saliva in under 10 min without any further sample processing. Evaluation of 36 positive and 37 negative patient saliva samples produced a clinical sensitivity of 80.5 % and specificity of 100 % and the sensor could detect the wildtype virus as well as the Alpha and Delta variants in the patient samples, which is the first reported rapid test that can detect any emerging variant of SARS-CoV-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据