4.8 Article

Partial Coordination-Perturbed Bi-Copper Sites for Selective Electroreduction of CO2 to Hydrocarbons

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 36, 页码 19829-19835

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202105343

关键词

copper; crystalline coordination compounds; single-chain model system; synergistic effects

资金

  1. NSFC [21622104, 92061101, 21871142, 21901122]
  2. NSF of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20171032]
  3. Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [19KJB150011]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630572, 2019M651873]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  6. Foundation of Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedical Functional Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a stable crystalline single-chain catalyst model system for systematically investigating the influence of synergistic effects on the selective generation of products in the electrochemical CO2RR.
In the electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR), it is challenging to develop a stable, well-defined catalyst model system that is able to examine the influence of the synergistic effect between adjacent catalytic active sites on the selective generation of C1 or C2 products. We have designed and synthesized a stable crystalline single-chain catalyst model system for electrochemical CO2RR, which involves four homomorphic one-dimensional chain-like compounds (Cu-PzH, Cu-PzCl, Cu-PzBr, and Cu-PzI). The main structural difference of these four chains is the substituents of halogen atoms with different electronegativity on the Pz ligands. Consequently, different synergistic effects between bi-copper centers lead to changes in the faradic efficiency (FECH4 :FEC2H4 ). This work provides a simple and stable crystalline single-chain model system for systematically studying the influence of coordination microenvironment on catalytically active centers in the CO2RR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据