4.8 Article

Catalytic Enantioselective Access to Dihydroquinoxalinones via Formal α-Halo Acyl Halide Synthon in One Pot

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 44, 页码 23819-23826

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202110173

关键词

asymmetric catalysis; domino ring-opening cyclization; epoxidation; heterocycles; one-pot reactions

资金

  1. University of Salerno [ORSA187525]
  2. PON RI 2014-2020
  3. University of Bologna (RFO funds 2020)
  4. Universita degli Studi di Salerno within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates an enantioselective one-pot catalytic strategy for the synthesis of dihydroquinoxalinones, using a combination of catalysts and intermediates to achieve high enantioselectivity in the formation of medicinally relevant heterocycles. The reusability of the organocatalyst and the mechanistic insights into the DROC process provide valuable information for further development of enantioselective synthesis strategies.
An enantioselective one-pot catalytic strategy to dihydroquinoxalinones, featuring novel 1-phenylsulfonyl-1-cyano enantioenriched epoxides as masked alpha-halo acyl halide synthons, followed by a domino ring-opening cyclization (DROC), is documented. A popular quinine-derived urea served as the catalyst in two out of the three steps performed in the same solvent using commercially available aldehydes, (phenylsulfonyl)acetonitrile, cumyl hydroperoxide and 1,2-phenylendiamines. Medicinally relevant 3-aryl/alkyl-substituted heterocycles are isolated in generally good to high overall yield and high enantioselectivity (up to 99 % ee). A rare example of excellent reusability of an organocatalyst at higher scale, subjected to oxidative conditions, is demonstrated. Mechanistically, labile alpha-ketosulfone has been detected as the intermediate involved in the DROC process. Theoretical calculations on the key epoxidation step rationalize the observed stereocontrol, highlighting the important role played by the sulfone group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据