4.8 Article

Photocatalytic Decarboxylative Coupling of Aliphatic N-hydroxyphthalimide Esters with Polyfluoroaryl Nucleophiles

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 44, 页码 23557-23563

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202108465

关键词

aliphatic acid; copper; photocatalysis; polyfluoroarylation; reaction mechanisms

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_181977]
  2. NCCR Catalysis, a National Centre of Competence in Research - Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_181977] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents a decarboxylative coupling reaction using photoredox and copper catalysis to convert alkyl carboxylic acids into polyfluoroaryl compounds. The method demonstrates broad scope and good functional group compatibility, with the potential to achieve a wide range of F-substitution patterns on the aryl groups. Mechanistic study suggests a [Cu-(Ar-F)(2)] species may be responsible for the transfer of polyfluoroaryl groups to alkyl radicals.
Polyfluoroarenes are an important class of compounds in medical and material chemistry. The synthesis of alkylated polyfluoroarenes remains challenging. Here we describe a decarboxylative coupling reaction of N-hydroxyphthalimide esters of aliphatic carboxylic acids with polyfluoroaryl zinc reagents (Zn-Ar-F) via synergetic photoredox and copper catalysis. This method readily converts primary and secondary alkyl carboxylic acids into the corresponding polyfluoroaryl compounds, which could have a wide range of F-content (2F-5F) and variable F-substitution patterns on the aryl groups. Broad scope and good functional group compatibility were achieved, including on substrates derived from natural products and pharmaceuticals. Mechanistic study revealed that a [Cu-(Ar-F)(2)] species could be responsible for the transfer of polyfluoroaryl groups to the alkyl radicals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据