4.8 Article

Beam Search for Automated Design and Scoring of Novel ROR Ligands with Machine Intelligence

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 35, 页码 19477-19482

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202104405

关键词

de novo design; deep learning; drug discovery; neural network; nuclear receptor

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [205321_182176]
  2. RETHINK initiative at ETH Zurich
  3. Novartis Forschungsstiftung (FreeNovation grant AI in Drug Discovery)
  4. Projekt DEAL
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [205321_182176] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical language models coupled with the beam search algorithm were used to automate molecule design and scoring, resulting in the discovery of novel inverse agonists for retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptors (RORs). These designs were synthesizable in three reaction steps and exhibited low-micromolar to nanomolar potency towards RORg, showcasing the potential of generative artificial intelligence in data-driven drug discovery.
Chemical language models enable de novo drug design without the requirement for explicit molecular construction rules. While such models have been applied to generate novel compounds with desired bioactivity, the actual prioritization and selection of the most promising computational designs remains challenging. Herein, we leveraged the probabilities learnt by chemical language models with the beam search algorithm as a model-intrinsic technique for automated molecule design and scoring. Prospective application of this method yielded novel inverse agonists of retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptors (RORs). Each design was synthesizable in three reaction steps and presented low-micromolar to nanomolar potency towards RORg. This model-intrinsic sampling technique eliminates the strict need for external compound scoring functions, thereby further extending the applicability of generative artificial intelligence to data-driven drug discovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据