4.8 Article

Selective Permeable Lithium-Ion Channels on Lithium Metal for Practical Lithium-Sulfur Pouch Cells

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 33, 页码 18031-18036

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202101958

关键词

lithium metal anode; lithium-sulfur batteries; polymer chains; pouch cell; selective permeable channels

资金

  1. Joint Committee of the Sino-German Center for Research Promotion [M-0240]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1801257, 21825501]
  3. Scientific and Technological Key Project of Shanxi Province [20191102003]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0202500]
  5. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By designing selectively permeable lithium-ion channels on the surface of lithium metal, lithium ions can pass through while polysulfides are effectively blocked, resulting in improved performance and cycle life of lithium-sulfur batteries.
Lithium metal batteries are considered a promising candidate for high-energy-density energy storage. However, the strong reducibility and high reactivity of lithium lead to low Coulombic efficiency when contacting oxidants, such as lithium polysulfide caused by the serious shuttle effect in lithium-sulfur batteries. Herein we design selectively permeable lithium-ion channels on lithium metal surface, which allow lithium ions to pass through by electrochemical overpotential, while the polysulfides are effectively blocked due to the much larger steric hindrance than lithium ions. The selective permeation of lithium ions through the channels is further elucidated by the molecular simulation and visualization experiment. Consequently, a prolonged cycle life of 75 cycles and high Coulombic efficiency of 99 % are achieved in a practical Li-S pouch cell with limited amounts of lithium and electrolyte, confirming the unique role the selective ion permeation plays in protecting highly reactive alkali metal anodes in working batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据