4.8 Article

[o-C5H4NHOH]2[I7O18(OH)]•3H2O: An Organic-Inorganic Hybrid SHG Material Featuring an [I7O18(OH)]∞2- Branched Polyiodate Chain

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 32, 页码 17426-17429

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202106335

关键词

[I7O18(OH)](infinity)(2-) branched chain; asymmetric organic amine group; organic-inorganic hybrid polyiodate; SHG material; theoretical calculations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22031009, 21875248, 21921001, 21975256]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB20000000]
  3. 100 Talents Project of Fujian Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An organic-inorganic hybrid polyiodate with a novel branched polyiodate chain structure has been successfully synthesized. This compound exhibits excellent Second-Harmonic-Generation (SHG) performance and a high laser-induced-damage-threshold (LIDT) under laser radiation, showing promising potential for applications.
An organic-inorganic hybrid polyiodate, namely, [o-C5H4NHOH](2)[I7O18(OH)]center dot 3H(2)O (I), featuring a novel branched polyiodate chain has been obtained by evaporation method. [o-C5H4NHOH](2)[I7O18(OH)]center dot 3H(2)O (I) crystalizes in the polar space group Ia and features an [I7O18(OH)](infinity)(2-) branched polyiodate chain in which [I3O9](3-) trimers are grafted on the same side of the one-dimensional (1D) chain based on [I4O11(OH)](3-) tetramers. The asymmetric organic amine groups are beneficial to the polymerization of iodate groups and inducing the formation of the non-centrosymmetric (NCS) structure. Compound I exhibits a rather large Second-Harmonic- Generation (SHG) signal of 8.5xKH(2)PO(4) (KDP) upon 1064 nm laser radiation, a moderate band gap of 3.90 eV and a high laser-induced-damage-threshold (LIDT) of 182.34 MW cm(-2), hence it is a promising new SHG material. The relationship between the structures of the organic amine groups and the overall structures has been also analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据