4.8 Article

Conductive Two-Dimensional Phthalocyanine-based Metal-Organic Framework Nanosheets for Efficient Electroreduction of CO2

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 31, 页码 17108-17114

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202104564

关键词

CO; conductive metal-organic frameworks; electroreduction; phthalocyanine

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0208600, 2018YFA0704502]
  2. NSFC [21871263, 22071245, 21671188, 22033008]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB20000000]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [Y201850]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are promising alternatives for CO2RR due to their periodic arrangement of isolated metal active sites, but traditional MOFs have poor conductivity. Researchers have prepared conductive 2D phthalocyanine-based MOF nanosheets, which exhibit a high efficiency and selectivity for CO production.
The electrocatalytic conversion of CO2 into valueadded chemicals is a promising approach to realize a carbon-energy balance. However, low current density still limits the application of the CO2 electroreduction reaction (CO2RR). Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are one class of promising alternatives for the CO2RR due to their periodically arranged isolated metal active sites. However, the poor conductivity of traditional MOFs usually results in a low current density in CO2RR. We have prepared conductive two-dimensional (2D) phthalocyanine-based MOF (NiPc-NiO4) nanosheets linked by nickel-catecholate, which can be employed as highly efficient electrocatalysts for the CO2RR to CO. The obtained NiPc-NiO4 has a good conductivity and exhibited a very high selectivity of 98.4% toward CO production and a large CO partial current density of 34.5 mAcm(-2), outperforming the reported MOF catalysts. This work highlights the potential of conductive crystalline frameworks in electrocatalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据