4.8 Article

Porous Metal-Organic Framework Liquids for Enhanced CO2 Adsorption and Catalytic Conversion

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 38, 页码 20915-20920

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202107156

关键词

CO2 adsorption; cycloaddition reactions; ionic liquids; metal-organic frameworks; porous liquids

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0208600, 2018YFA0704502]
  2. NSFC [22071245, 21871263, 22033008]
  3. Fujian Science & Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China [2021ZZ103]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [Y201850]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new strategy for fabricating porous MOF liquids with permanent porosity and fluidity, which have significantly increased CO2 adsorption capacity and can be used for synthesizing cyclic carbonates.
The unique applications of porous metal-organic framework (MOF) liquids with permanent porosity and fluidity have attracted significant attention. However, fabrication of porous MOF liquids remains challenging because of the easy intermolecular self-filling of the cavity or the rapid settlement of porous hosts in hindered solvents that cannot enter their pores. Herein, we report a facile strategy for the fabrication of a MOF liquid (Im-UiO-PL) by surface ionization of an imidazolium-functionalized framework with a sterically hindered poly(ethylene glycol) sulfonate (PEGS) canopy. The Im-UiO-PL obtained in this way has a CO2 adsorption approximately 14 times larger than that of pure PEGS. Distinct from a porous MOF solid counterpart, the stored CO2 in Im-UiO-PL can be slowly released and efficiently utilized to synthesize cyclic carbonates in the atmosphere. This is the first example of the use of a porous MOF liquid as a CO2 storage material for catalysis. It offers a new method for the fabrication of unique porous liquid MOFs with functional behaviors in various fields of gas adsorption and catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据