4.8 Article

Improving the Sensitivity for Quantifying Heparan Sulfate from Biological Samples

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 32, 页码 11191-11199

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01761

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [HL094463, HL144970, GM123792, GM131124, GM008450, AR070179]
  2. Eshelman Innovation Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heparan sulfates (HSs) are important glycans in animals, and a new analysis technique can accurately determine the amount and disaccharide composition of HS, aiding in understanding its role in diseases. The method can be used to assess levels of HS in plasma/serum and tissues/organs, potentially providing new biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis.
Heparan sulfates (HSs) are widely expressed glycans in the animal kingdom. HS plays a role in regulating cell differentiation/proliferation, embryonic development, blood coagulation, inflammatory response, and viral infection. The amount of HS and its structural information are critically important for investigating the functions of HS in vivo. A sensitive and reliable quantitative technique for the analysis of HS from biological samples is under development. Here, we report a new labeling reagent for HS disaccharides analysis, 6-amino-N-(2-diethylamino)ethyl quinoline-2-carboamide (AMQC). The AMQC-conjugated disaccharides are analyzed by LC-MS/MS in positive mode, significantly improving the sensitivity. The use of AMQC coupled with authentic C-13-labeled HS disaccharide internal standards empowered us to determine the amount and the disaccharide composition of the HS on a single histological slide. We used this method to profile the levels of HS in the plasma/serum and tissues/organs to assist the disease prognosis in two animal models, including the acetaminophen (APAP)-induced acute liver injury mouse model and the burn injury mouse model. The method may uncover the roles of HS contributing to the diseases as well as provide a potential new set of biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据