4.8 Article

Alkaline Phosphatase-Triggered Etching of Au@FeOOH Nanoparticles for Enzyme Level Assay under Dark-Field Microscopy

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 30, 页码 10727-10734

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02761

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [22034003, 22074063, 21974061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and sensitive plasmonic probe (Au@FeOOH) was synthesized and used for alkaline phosphatase level detection, showing excellent linear range and detection limit. By using ΔR/G value as the analytical signal, the method effectively suppressed errors and exhibited excellent selectivity in complex biological serum samples, promising for early diagnosis of clinical diseases in the future.
In clinical diagnosis, the level of biological enzymes in serum has been generally regarded as markers of human diseases. In this work, a kind of simple and sensitive plasmonic probe (indicated as Au@FeOOH) has been synthesized with the guidance of plasmonic imaging and subsequently developed for the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level detection under dark-field microscopy (DFM). As a kind of hydrolysis enzyme, ALP can promote the hydrolysis of L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate to ascorbic acid (AA). AA further acts as a strong reduction reagent for the decomposition of the FeOOH shell, which results in a blue shift of localized surface plasmon resonance spectra and an obvious color change under DFM. RGB analyses show that using a Delta R/G value instead of scattering wavelength or R/G value as the analytical signal, the deviation attributed to the size distribution of the initial Au NPs is greatly suppressed, and a linear range from 0.2 to 6.0 U/L (R-2 = 0.99) and a limit of detection of 0.06 U/L are acquired with various concentrations of ALP during the detection. Besides, this approach exhibits excellent selectivity in complex biological serum samples, which is expected to be applied for the early diagnosis of clinical diseases by monitoring various biomarkers in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据