4.8 Article

Direct Quantification and Visualization of Homocysteine, Cysteine, and Glutathione in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease Model Tissues

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 28, 页码 9878-9886

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01945

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21877035, 21977028]
  2. Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province [18B004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel fluorescent probe was designed for direct quantification of serum Hcy and Cys, and achieved differentiation and simultaneous fluorescence imaging of Cys, Hcy, and GSH dynamics in living cells, tissues, and animal models of AD and PD, providing the first direct evidence for the relationship between Hcy/Cys/GSH and AD/PD.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are chronic neurodegenerative diseases with high morbidity and mortality. Homocysteine (Hcy), cysteine (Cys), and glutathione (GSH) are closely related to AD and PD. However, the dynamics of Hcy, Cys, and GSH in the brain tissues and the potential pathogenesis between Cys/Hcy/GSH with AD and PD remain unclear. Herein, a novel fluorescent probe 1 with multiple binding sites was rationally designed and exploited for the direct quantification of serum total Hcy and Cys along with superior optical properties. Importantly, differentiation and simultaneity fluorescence imaging of Cys, Hcy, and GSH dynamics were achieved in living cells, tissues, and mouse models of AD and PD with this probe, providing direct evidences for the relationship between Hcy/Cys/GSH and AD/PD for the first time. In addition, pathogenesis studies demonstrated that elevated Hcy and Cys levels are closely related to imbalanced redox homeostasis, increased amyloid aggregates, and nerve cell cytotoxicity. These findings will greatly promote the understanding of the functions of Hcy/Cys/GSH in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, demonstrating clinical promise for the early diagnosis and prevention of AD and PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据