4.8 Article

DNA Three-Way Junction with Multiple Recognition Regions Mediated an Unconfined DNA Walker for Electrochemical Ultrasensitive Detection of miRNA-182-5p

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 38, 页码 12981-12986

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02668

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21974108, 21775124]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M663417, 2020T130544]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Chongqing Natural Science Foundation [cstc2020jcyj-bsh0026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a DNA three-way junction with multiple recognition regions was engineered to act as an efficient and fast DNA walker for electrochemical detection of miRNA-182-5p. This walker could walk on the electrode surface without confinement, significantly improving detection efficiency and sensitivity.
In this work, a DNA three-way junction (TWJ) with multiple recognition regions was intelligently engineered, which could be applied as an unconfined DNA walker with a rapid walking speed and high sensitivity for electrochemical detection of microRNA (miRNA-182-5p). Once the target miRNA was presented, the hairpins on TWJ could be successively opened to form an annular DNA walker, which could walk on the entire scope of the electrode surface without the confine for the length of DNA walker legs compared with the traditional DNA walker, greatly improving the walking efficiency. In addition, this DNA walker with multirecognition segments could obviously increase the local concentration of recognition sites, which significantly enhanced the detection speed and sensitivity. As a result, this proposed biosensor with annular DNA as a walker could dexterously achieve the ultrasensitive and fast detection of miRNA-182-5p from 0.1 fM to 1 nM with a detection limit of 31.13 aM. Meaningfully, this strategy explored an innovative path in the design of a new DNA walker nanostructure for accomplishing speedy and sensitive detection of biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据