4.8 Article

Rapid Sample Preparation Using Slug Flow-Laminar Flow: Passive In Situ Microextraction/Stripping Coupling

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 32, 页码 11233-11242

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02096

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776152, 22078170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to improve the detection accuracy of radioactive samples, a novel hybrid SFLF microchip was designed for one-step sample preparation, which effectively addressed the difficulty in maintaining stable water-organic-water interfaces and demonstrated high mass transfer efficiency. The system's applicability in preparing radioactive samples was confirmed through selective separation of Ce and Pr from Cs and Sr, showcasing stable flow pattern and superior operating flexibility.
To increase the detection accuracy of radioactive samples, sample preparation through liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) before instrumental analysis is a crucial step. LLE preparation involves multiple steps including the tedious separation steps of co-extraction and stripping, which may cause sample loss, radioactive contamination, and radioactive leaks. In this study, a novel hybrid slug flow-laminar flow (SFLF) microchip in passive mode was designed to couple extraction and stripping in situ to realize a one-step sample preparation. The difficulty in maintaining stable water-organic-water interfaces was mitigated by using a partition wall and three resistance isolation areas. The mass transfer performance of the SFLF microchip was investigated and compared with that of the supported liquid membrane and three-layer laminar flow microextraction/stripping systems. Furthermore, the applicability of the SFLF system in preparing radioactive samples was validated through the selective separation of Ce and Pr from Cs and Sr. The novel SFLF microextraction/stripping system has a stable flow pattern, high mass transfer efficiency, and superior operating flexibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据