4.8 Article

Hand-Held Diode Laser for On-Site Analysis Using Transportable Mass Spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 23, 页码 8122-8127

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01083

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (Government of Catalonia)
  2. European Social Fund
  3. Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality [KB-23-002-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hand-held laser diode thermal desorption electrospray ionization (LDTD-ESI) mass spectrometry method was developed for rapid screening of illegal substances in solid samples. By optimizing ESI parameters and combining with a transportable single quadrupole mass spectrometer, rapid identification of selective androgen receptor modulators in drug samples was achieved.
A hand-held laser diode thermal desorption electrospray ionization (LDTD-ESI) mass spectrometry (MS) method was developed for rapid screening of illegal substances in solid samples. To achieve that, a simple, inexpensive, battery-powered surgical laser diode at 940 nm was employed to ablate the solid samples. The potential of using a black polytetrafluoroethylene substrate to enhance the analytes' desorption to the gas phase was investigated and demonstrated. Among the optimized ESI parameters, the solvent (methanol/water, 50:50, v/v) and the flow rate (50 mu L (h-1)) were critical to obtain the best sensitivity. The applicability was demonstrated for the rapid identification of selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) in pills and powders based on accurate mass measurements by time-of-flight MS. Also, the hand-held LDTD-ESI was combined with a transportable single quadrupole MS. The same SARMs samples were analyzed, and identifications were based on in-source cone voltage fragmentation patterns observed. These initial results demonstrate the applicability of the developed simplified LDTD-ESI MS method for future on-site testing of organic compounds in solid samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据