4.8 Article

Sputum-Based Tumor Fluid Biopsy: Isolation and High-Throughput Single-Cell Analysis of Exfoliated Tumor Cells for Lung Cancer Diagnosis

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 30, 页码 10477-10486

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00833

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21927811, 91859111, 21804082, 21904081]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China [ZR2019JQ06, ZR2018BB011, ZR2019MH119]
  3. Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province [tsqn.201909077]
  4. Local Science and Technology Development Fund by the Central Government [YDZX20203700002568]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M602179]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The innovative lung cancer diagnosis method proposed in this study uses microfluidic technology for efficient isolation and analysis of exfoliated tumor cells in sputum, providing a practical strategy for non-invasive detection and screening of lung cancer in high-risk groups.
Timely and effective diagnosis is of great significance for improving the survival rate of lung cancer patients. Although histopathology is the main diagnostic tool among the existing methods for lung cancer diagnosis, it is not suitable for high-risk groups, early lung cancer patients, patients with advanced-stage disease, and other situations wherein tumor tissues cannot be obtained. In view of this, we proposed an innovative lung cancer diagnosis method employing for the first time a microfluidic technology for high-efficiency isolation and high-throughput single-cell analysis of exfoliated tumor cells (ETCs) in sputum. This method fully combines the advantages of traditional sputum cytology and microfluidic technology and realizes the diagnosis of lung cancer by using a small amount of repeatable ETCs instead of the tumor tissue. This method is expected to provide a practical strategy for the non-invasive detection of lung cancer patients and lung cancer screening for high-risk groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据