4.7 Article

Non-enzymatic electrochemical cholesterol sensor based on strong host-guest interactions with a polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM) with DFT study

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 413, 期 26, 页码 6523-6533

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03616-w

关键词

Cholesterol; Polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM); Methylene blue; Electrochemical sensor; DFT calculations

资金

  1. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili Research Council, Ardabil, Iran [3051234502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in materials science have accelerated the development of diagnostic tools, with recent progress in enzyme-free sensors. However, the specificity of non-enzymatic sensors remains a challenging task. This work presents a reagent displacement assay for cholesterol detection in serum samples, achieving a low detection limit.
Advances in materials science have accelerated the development of diagnostic tools with the last decade witnessing the development of enzyme-free sensors, owing to the improved stability, low cost and simple fabrication of component materials. However, the specificity of non-enzymatic sensors for certain analytes still represents a challenging task, for example the determination of cholesterol level in blood is vital due to its medical relevance. In this work, a reagent displacement assay for cholesterol sensing in serum samples was developed. It is based on coating of a glassy carbon electrode with a polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM) that forms a host-guest complex with methylene blue (MB). In the presence of cholesterol, the MB electroactive probe was displaced due to the stronger association of cholesterol guest to the PIM host. The decrease in the oxidative current was proportional to the cholesterol concentration achieving a detection limit of approximately 0.1 nM. Moreover, to further assist the experimental studies, comprehensive theoretical calculations are also performed by using density functional theory (DFT) calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据