4.7 Review

A review of biosensors for the detection of B-type natriuretic peptide as an important cardiovascular biomarker

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 413, 期 24, 页码 5949-5967

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-021-03490-6

关键词

Biosensor; Biomarker; B-type natriuretic peptide; Heart failure

资金

  1. University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heart disease poses a serious threat to human health globally, leading to rising mortality rates. B-type natriuretic peptide is a crucial biomarker for diagnosis of heart failure, but faces challenges such as low concentration and short half-life in blood.
Heart disease, as the most serious threat to human health globally, is responsible for rising mortality rates, largely due to lifestyle and diet. Unfortunately, the main problem for patients at high risk of heart disease is the validation of prognostic tests. To this end, the detection of cardiovascular biomarkers has been employed to obtain pathological and physiological information in order to improve prognosis and early-stage diagnosis of chronic heart failure. Short-term changes in B-type natriuretic peptide are known as a standard and important biomarker for diagnosis of heart failure. The most important problem for detection is low concentration and short half-life in the blood. The normal concentration of BNP in blood is less than 7 nM (25 pg/mL), which increases significantly to more than 80 pg/mL. Therefore, the development of new biosensors with better sensitivity, detection limit, and dynamic range than current commercial kits is urgently needed. This review classifies the biosensors designed for detection of BNP into electrochemical, optical, microfluidic, and lateral-flow immunoassay techniques. The review clearly demonstrates that a variety of immunoassay, aptasensor, enzymatic and catalytic nanomaterials, and fluorophores have been successfully employed for detection of BNP at low attomolar ranges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据