4.7 Article

NiCo-LDH nanoflake arrays-supported Au nanoparticles on copper foam as a highly sensitive electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensor

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1177, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338787

关键词

Non-enzymatic; Glucose sensor; Electrochemical; NiCo-LDH@Au/Cu

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LGC19B050006, LQ21B050002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensor, NiCo-LDH@Au/Cu electrode, was successfully fabricated with high electrocatalytic activity for glucose oxidation. The sensor exhibited a wide linear range, low detection limit, ultra-prompt response time, high sensitivity, good selectivity, and stability, making it a promising candidate for glucose detection in human serum.
The detection of glucose in human blood is of great importance in the diagnosis and prevention of diabetes. In this work, we fabricated a novel electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensor, NiCo-LDH nanoflake arrays-supported Au nanoparticles on copper foam (NiCo-LDH@ Au/Cu) by galvanic replace-ment and electrodeposition methods. Owing to the synergistic effect of three-dimensional (3D) archi-tecture of Cu foam, high electrocatalytic activity of Au nanoparticles and NiCo-LDH nanoflake arrays, the NiCo-LDH@Au/Cu electrode exhibits excellent electrocatalytic ability for glucose oxidation in NaOH so-lution. Under optimized conditions, the NiCo-LDH@Au/Cu electrode shows excellent activity with a linear range from 0.5 to 3000 mM at the potential of 0.50 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), a low detection limit of 0.23 mM (S/N = 3), an ultra-prompt response time of 0.5 s, and a high sensitivity of 23100 mA mM(-1) cm(-2), as well as good selectivity and stability. Furthermore, the as-fabricated non-enzymatic glucose sensor was suc-cessfully applied to the glucose detection in human serum as a promising candidate in the development of electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensor. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据