4.1 Article

A novel in situ methodology for visual detection of Clostridium perfringens in pork harnessing saltatory rolling circle amplification

期刊

ANAEROBE
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102324

关键词

C; perfringens; SRCA; Meat; Rapid detection; Culture-independent; Isothermal amplification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The saltatory rolling circle amplification (SRCA) assay is developed for culture-independent, rapid and visual detection of Clostridium perfringens, showing high specificity and sensitivity. It can achieve detection limits in a short period of time, making it suitable for on-site testing in the food industry.
Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens), a prolific toxin-producing anaerobe is an important foodborne pathogen with a huge public health concern. Rapid and on-site detection of C. perfringens is of specific importance in developing countries. In the present study, saltatory rolling circle amplification (SRCA) assay was developed for culture-independent, rapid and visual detection of C. perfringens and evaluated in meat with pork as a model. The specificity of the SRCA assay was ascertained by using 62 C. perfringens and 18 non-C. perfringens strains. The analytical sensitivity of the developed SRCA, conventional and real-time PCR assays were 80 fg, 800 fg and 800 fg DNA per tube, respectively. The limit of detection of the SRCA assay was 80 CFU/g of pork in the absence of enrichment and 8 CFU/g after short enrichment of 6 h. The detection limits of 80 CFU/g and 8 CFU/g of pork were attained within 120 min and 8 h, respectively. Real-world or field relevancy of the developed assay was evaluated by screening 82 raw and processed pork samples. As the developed assay is simple, user-friendly, cost-effective and sophisticated equipment free, it would be more suitable for on-site testing of C. perfringens in foods. To our information, this is the first report to apply SRCA for the detection of C. perfringens. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据