4.5 Review

CSF-Venous Fistulas: Anatomy and Diagnostic Imaging

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
卷 217, 期 6, 页码 1418-1429

出版社

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.21.26182

关键词

CSF-venous fistula; CT myelography; digital subtraction myelography; spinal CSF leak; spontaneous intracranial hypotension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CSF-venous fistulas are an important cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension, but can be challenging to detect on conventional imaging. Specialized myelographic techniques have been developed to aid in identification of CVFs, though further dissemination is needed. Knowledge of different imaging techniques is crucial in treating patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension.
CSF-venous fistulas (CVFs), first described in 2014, are an important cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. CVFs can be challenging to detect on conventional anatomic imaging because, unlike other types of spinal CSF leak, they do not typically result in pooling of fluid in the epidural space, and imaging signs of CVF may be subtle. Specialized myelographic techniques have been developed to help with CVF identification, but these techniques are not yet widely disseminated. This article reviews the current understanding of CVFs, emphasizing correlations between venous anatomy and imaging findings as well as potential mechanisms for pathogenesis, and describes current imaging techniques used for CVF diagnosis and localization. These techniques are broadly classified into fluoroscopy-based methods, including digital subtraction myelography and dynamic myelography, and cross-sectional methods, including decubitus CT myelography and MR myelography with intrathecal injection of gadolinium. Knowledge of these various options, including their relative advantages and disadvantages, is critical in the care of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Investigation is ongoing, and continued advances in knowledge about CVFs as well as in optimal imaging detection are anticipated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据