4.5 Review

MRI Evaluation of Patients Before and After Interventions for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Update

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
卷 218, 期 1, 页码 88-99

出版社

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.21.26278

关键词

benign prostatic hyperplasia; BPH; MRI; prostate; treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are various minimally invasive surgical therapies available for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including laser-based and thermal ablation procedures, which result in volume reduction of prostatic tissue. While MRI is not commonly used in the routine preprocedural evaluation of BPH, emerging data suggest a potential role for MRI in predicting postprocedure outcomes.
Transurethral resection of the prostate is the most commonly performed procedure for the management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, in recent years, various minimally invasive surgical therapies have been introduced to treat BPH. These include laser-based procedures such as holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and photoselective vaporization of the prostate as well as thermal ablation procedures such as water vapor thermal therapy (Rezirm), all of which result in volume reduction of periurethral prostatic tissue. In comparison, a permanent metallic device (UroLift) can be implanted to pull open the prostatic urethra without an associated decrease in prostate size, and selective catheter-directed prostate artery embolization results in a global decrease in prostate size. The goal of this article is to familiarize radiologists with the underlying anatomic changes that occur in BPH as visualized on MRI and to describe the appearance of the prostate on MRI performed after these procedures. Complications encountered on imaging after these procedures are also discussed. Although MRI is not currently used in the routine preprocedural evaluation of BPH, emerging data support a role for MRI in predicting postprocedure outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据