4.5 Review

Pilot and Feasibility Studies in Rehabilitation Research A Review and Educational Primer for the Physiatrist Researcher

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001797

关键词

Feasibility; Pilot Studies; Rehabilitation Research; Reporting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review investigates the current state of pilot and feasibility studies in rehabilitation research and provides recommendations for improving their design and reporting. The findings suggest that some studies have problems in labeling and reporting, and researchers are recommended to correctly label studies based on accepted definitions, explicitly state the feasibility objectives and criteria, and appropriately interpret and report the implications of feasibility findings for the main study.
Pilot and feasibility studies are conducted early in the clinical research pathway to evaluate whether a future, definitive study can or should be done and, if so, how. Poor planning and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies can compromise subsequent research efforts. Inappropriate labeling of studies as pilots also compromises education. In this review, first, a systematic survey of the current state of pilot and feasibility studies in rehabilitation research was performed, and second, recommendations were made for improvements to their design and reporting. In a random sample of 100 studies, half (49.5%) were randomized trials. Thirty (30.0%) and three (3.0%) studies used pilot and feasibility in the study title, respectively. Only one third (34.0%) of studies provided a primary objective related to feasibility. Most studies (92.0%) stated an intent for hypothesis testing. Although many studies (70.0%) mentioned outcomes related to feasibility in the methods, a third (30.0%) reported additional outcomes in the results and discussion only or commented on feasibility anecdotally. The reporting of progression plans to a main study (21.0%) and progression criteria (4.0%) was infrequent. Based on these findings, it is recommended that researchers correctly label studies as a pilot or feasibility design based on accepted definitions, explicitly state feasibility objectives, outcomes, and criteria for determining success of feasibility, justify the sample size, and appropriately interpret and report the implications of feasibility findings for the main future study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据