4.2 Article

Expanding the phenotype: Four new cases and hope for treatment in Bachmann-Bupp syndrome

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 185, 期 11, 页码 3485-3493

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62473

关键词

alopecia; Bachmann-Bupp syndrome; DFMO; macrocephaly; ODC1; polyamines

资金

  1. Michigan State University Alliance Corporation
  2. Spectrum Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bachmann-Bupp syndrome is a rare condition caused by gain-of-function variants in the ODC1 gene. Recent diagnosis in four new patients has expanded the understanding of the syndrome, including the discovery of late-onset seizures in a 23-year-old patient. The natural history of the syndrome will continue to evolve with the introduction of DFMO therapy.
Bachmann-Bupp syndrome (BABS) is a rare syndrome caused by gain-of-function variants in the C-terminus of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC coded by the ODC1 gene). BABS is characterized by developmental delay, macrocephaly, macrosomia, and an unusual pattern of non-congenital alopecia. Recent diagnosis of four more BABS patients provides further characterization of the phenotype of this syndrome including late-onset seizures in the oldest reported patient at 23 years of age, representing the first report for this phenotype in BABS. Neuroimaging abnormalities continue to be an inconsistent feature of the syndrome. This may be related to the yet unknown impact of ODC/polyamine dysregulation on the developing brain in this syndrome. Variants continue to cluster, providing support to a universal biochemical mechanism related to elevated ODC protein, enzyme activity, and abnormalities in polyamine levels. Recommendations for medical management can now be suggested as well as the potential for targeted molecular or metabolic testing when encountering this unique phenotype. The natural history of this syndrome will evolve with difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) therapy and raise new questions for further study and understanding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据