4.2 Article

Elevated holo-transcobalamin in Gaucher disease type II: A case report

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 185, 期 8, 页码 2471-2476

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62252

关键词

biomarker; Gaucher disease type II; holo‐ TC; macrophage

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. University of Freiburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gaucher disease is classified into types I, II, and III based on neurological complications, with type II being the most severe. Abnormalities in B-12 metabolism markers have been observed in type I patients, but a 2-month-old male with type II presented with elevated B-12 and holo-TC levels. This study suggests that higher levels of holo-TC may be associated with a more severe form of Gaucher disease and serve as a biomarker for type II.
Gaucher disease (GD), one of the most common lysosomal disorders, is caused by deficiency of beta-glucocerebrosidase. Based on the presence and severity of neurological complications, GD is classified into types I, II (the most severe form), and III. Abnormalities in systemic markers of vitamin B-12 (B-12) metabolism have been reported in GD type I patients, suggesting a higher prevalence of B-12 deficiency in these patients. A 2-month-old male with GD type II was admitted to the hospital presenting jaundice, hepatosplenomegaly, and ichthyosis. At admission, cholestasis and ascites, abnormal liver function enzymes, prolonged prothrombin time, and high levels of B-12 were confirmed. Analysis of biomarkers of B-12 status revealed elevated B-12 and holo-transcobalamin (holo-TC) levels. The B-12 profile found in our patient is the opposite to what is described for GD type I patients. Holo-TC may increase in inflammatory states or due to liver diseases. In GD, the accumulation of glucocerebroside may be a trigger that initiates a systemic inflammatory reaction, characterized by macrophage activation. We suggest higher levels of holo-TC could be associated with a more severe (neuronopathic) GD, and be a biomarker of GD type II.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据