4.5 Review

Review of aerosolized hydrogen peroxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, and hydrogen peroxide gas plasma in the decontamination of filtering facepiece respirators

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 203-213

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.06.012

关键词

N95 Respirator; Filtering Facepiece Respirator; Decontamination; Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide; Aerosolized Hydrogen Peroxide; COVID-19

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the literature on vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP), hydrogen peroxide gas plasma (HPGP), and aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP) as methods for decontamination of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). The study found that vHP has the most evidence supporting its use in FFR decontamination, consistent with CDC recommendations.
ABSTR A C T Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavi-rus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to over 170?million cases worldwide with over 33.2?million cases and 594,000 deaths in the US alone as of May 31st, 2021. The pandemic has also created severe shortages of personal pro-tective equipment, particularly of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued recommendations to help conserve FFRs, as well as crisis standards, including four criteria required for decontamination of the traditionally single use respirators. This review is designed to provide an overview of the current literature on vaporized hydrogen peroxide (vHP), hydrogen peroxide gas plasma (HPGP), and aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP) with respect to each of the four CDC decontam-ination criteria. Methods: PubMed and Medrxiv were queried for relevant articles. All articles underwent a title and abstract screen as well as subsequent full text screen by two blinded reviewers if indicated. Results: Searches yielded 195 papers, of which, 79 were found to be relevant. Of those, 23 papers presented unique findings and 8 additional articles and technical papers were added to provide a comprehensive review. Overall, while there are potential concerns for all 3 decontamination methods, we found that vHP has the most evidence supporting its use in FFR decontamination consistent with CDC recommendation. Conclusions: Future research is recommended to evaluate biological inactivation and real world fit failures after FFR reuse. (c) 2021 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据