4.4 Article

Preservation of Cardiac Reserve and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Acute De Novo Versus Acute on Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 74-80

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.036

关键词

-

资金

  1. Virginia Commonwealth University's grant from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science Bethesda, Maryland, United States [1UL1TR002649]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant Bethesda, Maryland, United States [R33 HL139943]
  3. Sapienza Visiting Professor Programme 2020 of the Sapienza Universita di Roma, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared cardiorespiratory fitness parameters between patients with de novo heart failure and those with acute on chronic heart failure. The results showed that patients with de novo HFrEF had better CRF parameters, indicating greater cardiac reserve during exercise compared to those with acute on chronic HFrEF.
There is limited understanding on the potential differences in the pathophysiology between de novo heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and acute on chronic HFrEF. The aim of this study was to assess differences in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) parameters between de novo heart failure and acute on chronic HFrEF using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX). We retrospectively analyzed CPX data measured within 2 weeks of discharge following acute hospitalization for HFrEF. Data are reported as median and interquartile range or frequency and percentage (%). We included 102 patients: 32 (31%) women, 81 (79%) black, 57 (51 to 64) years of age, BMI of 34 (29 to 39) Kg/m(2). Of these, 26 (25%) had de novo HFrEF and 76 (75%) had acute on chronic HFrEF. When compared with acute on chronic, patients with de novo HFrEF had a significantly higher peak oxygen consumption (VO2) (16.5 [12.2 to 19.4] vs 12.8 [10.1 to 15.3] ml.kg(-1).min(-1), p <0.001), %-predicted peak VO2 (58% [51 to 75] vs 49% [42 to 59]) p = 0.012), peak heart rate (134 [117 to 147] vs 117 [104 to 136] beats/min, p = 0.004), peak oxygen pulse (12.2 [10.5 to 15.5] vs 9.9 [8.0 to 13.1] ml/beat, p = 0.022) and circulatory power (2,823 [1,973 to 3,299] vs 1,902 [1,372 to 2,512] mm Hg.ml.kg(-1).min(-1), p = 0.002). No significant difference in resting left ventricular ejection fraction was found between groups. In conclusion, patients with de novo HFrEF have better CRF parameters than those with acute on chronic HFrEF. These differences are not explained by resting left ventricular systolic function but may be related to greater preservation in cardiac reserve during exercise in de novo HFrEF patients. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据