4.6 Article

Dangerous liaisons: Bacteria, antimicrobial therapies, and allergic diseases

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 76, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.15046

关键词

allergy; antibiotics; bacterial lysates; microbiota; probiotics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The composition and activities of microbiota play a crucial role in the education and development of a healthy immune system, with microbial dysbiosis being associated with allergic diseases. Improper use of antibiotics increases the risk of allergic diseases. Research shows potential for microbial therapies such as probiotics in the prevention and treatment of allergic diseases.
Microbiota composition and associated metabolic activities are essential for the education and development of a healthy immune system. Microbial dysbiosis, caused by risk factors such as diet, birth mode, or early infant antimicrobial therapy, is associated with the inception of allergic diseases. In turn, allergic diseases increase the risk for irrational use of antimicrobial therapy. Microbial therapies, such as probiotics, have been studied in the prevention and treatment of allergic diseases, but evidence remains limited due to studies with high heterogeneity, strain-dependent effectiveness, and variable outcome measures. In this review, we sketch the relation of microbiota with allergic diseases, the overuse and rationale for the use of antimicrobial agents in allergic diseases, and current knowledge concerning the use of bacterial products in allergic diseases. We urgently recommend 1) limiting antibiotic therapy in pregnancy and early childhood as a method contributing to the reduction of the allergy epidemic in children and 2) restricting antibiotic therapy in exacerbations and chronic treatment of allergic diseases, mainly concerning asthma and atopic dermatitis. Future research should be aimed at antibiotic stewardship implementation strategies and biomarker-guided therapy, discerning those patients that might benefit from antibiotic therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据