4.7 Article

Finnish farmers' views towards fluctuating and changing precipitation patterns pave the way for the future

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107011

关键词

Adaptation; Climate change; Drainage; Drought; Flooding; Irrigation; Soil conditions

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Finland (LOSSI) [480/03.02.06.00/2019]
  2. EASME/EU-Life (OPALLife) [LIFE14 CCM/FI/000254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study emphasizes that farmers need financial support and more information on the costs and benefits of measures to cope with changing precipitation patterns, especially due to uncertainties in projecting future patterns. Farmers prioritize soil organic content (SOC) and well-functioning subsurface drainage as main concerns, ahead of future irrigation use.
At high latitudes of Europe climate change is projected to alter the risk of flooding and drought depending on the season. Farmers are the ones who decide how and when to adapt to excess, scarcity, and even to extreme precipitation events in agriculture. To understand farmer's views on the needs and means to manage future changes in precipitation, a farmer survey was organized in 2018 with 4401 respondents and a follow-up survey in 2020 with 2000 respondents. The aims were: (1) to understand farmers' views on future changes in precipitation patterns, (2) to gain an insight into farmer views on prioritization of the potential key adaptation measures (irrigation, drainage and maintenance of soil conditions) to future floods and drought episodes and thereby, (3) to be better able to support farmers in their primary task of food production in a sustainable manner in a changing climate. This study highlighted that farmers need financial support, but also more information about the costs and benefits of the measures to cope with changing precipitation patterns-not least due to the many uncertainties in projecting future precipitation patterns. As fluctuating precipitation have many environmental impacts in addition to those on production per se, costs and investments of adaptation to climatic constraints should not be payable only by the farmers. Farmers prioritized the soil organic content (SOC) and wellfunctioning subsurface drainage as the main objects of their attention, and these were clearly ahead of future use of irrigation. Taking care of subsurface drainage, soil structure, SOC and functionality is the long-term means to maintain and improve sustainability and productivity, while the implementation of irrigation is a more flexible, one-off measure that requires short-term reactivity as an adaptation option.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据