4.7 Review

The Role of Rapamycin in Healthspan Extension via the Delay of Organ Aging

期刊

AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101376

关键词

Rapamycin; Healthspan; Organ aging; mTOR signaling; Adverse effects

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1302900]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Hubei Province, China [2016CFA064]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81671394, 81701438, 82001498]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-aging is a complex global challenge, and rapamycin can prolong healthy lifespan by inhibiting the mTOR pathway, although current evidence for its effectiveness in lifespan extension is not yet comprehensive. This drug has significant anti-aging effects on multiple organ systems.
Aging can not only shorten a healthy lifespan, but can also lead to multi-organ dysfunction and failure. Antiaging is a complex and worldwide conundrum for eliminating the various pathologies of senility. The past decade has seen great progress in the understanding of the aging-associated signaling pathways and their application for developing anti-aging approaches. Currently, some drugs can improve quality of life. The activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is one of the core and detrimental mechanisms related to aging; rapamycin can reduce the rate of aging, improve age-related diseases by inhibiting the mTOR pathway, and prolong lifespan and healthspan effectively. However, the current evidence for rapamycin in lifespan extension and organ aging is fragmented and scattered. In this review, we summarize the efficacy and safety of rapamycin in prolonging a healthy lifespan by systematically alleviating aging in multiple organ systems, i.e., the nervous, urinary, digestive, circulatory, motor, respiratory, endocrine, reproductive, integumentary and immune systems, to provide a theoretical basis for the future clinical application of rapamycin in antiaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据