4.7 Article

Experimental study of realistic low-noise technologies applied to a full-scale nose landing gear

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106705

关键词

Landing gear noise; Low noise technologies; Acoustic imaging; Wind-tunnel measurements; Aeroacoustics

资金

  1. European Union [308225, 620188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the performance of various low-noise technologies in wind-tunnel experiments, with the solid wheel axle fairing being identified as the most effective individual LNT, and achieving overall noise reductions of more than 4 dBA when combined with the ramp door spoiler and wheel hub caps.
The landing gear system is the dominant airframe noise source for most modern commercial aircraft during approach. This manuscript reports the results from the ALLEGRA (Advanced Low Noise Landing (Main and Nose) Gear for Regional Aircraft) project. This project assessed the performance of several highly realistic low-noise technologies (LNTs) applied to a detailed full-scale nose landing gear (NLG) model in aeroacoustic wind-tunnel experiments. Four individual low-noise concepts tested, namely a ramp door spoiler, a solid wheel axle fairing, wheel hub caps, and multiple perforated fairings. Combinations and small variations of some of these LNTs were also evaluated. The use of multiple planar microphone arrays allowed for the application of 2D and 3D acoustic imaging algorithms to assess the location and strength of the noise sources within the NLG system in different emission directions for each configuration. The wheel axle, the inner wheel hubs, the steering pinions and the torque link were identified as the noisiest NLG elements. The solid wheel axle fairing was the most effective individual LNT, and it improved its performance when applied in combination with the ramp door spoiler and wheel hub caps, reaching overall noise reductions of more than 4 dBA. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据