4.7 Article

Multi-scale modeling and experimental study of fatigue of plain-woven SiC/SiC composites

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106725

关键词

Ceramic matrix composites (CMCs); Fatigue; Multi-scale; Variable amplitude loading

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017IV00050042]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675266, 11972183]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M661834]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the fatigue life of plain-woven SiC/SiC composites was predicted using a multi-scale method. By combining micromechanical model with mesoscale finite element model, the mechanical relationships of yarns were derived, and a fiber random fracture model was adopted to simulate the fatigue failure of the yarns. The exponential increase in the number of fatigue cycles was used to improve the prediction speed of fatigue life, and the predicted results were in good agreement with experimental data.
The fatigue life of plain-woven SiC/SiC composites was predicted with the multi-scale method by combining the micromechanical model with the mesoscale finite element model. The micromechanical constitutive relationship of yarns under variable amplitude loading was derived, and the mesoscale finite element model was established by choosing the minimum repeatable unit as the unit cell. The degradation of interface shear stress was obtained by fitting the secant modulus of hysteresis loop, and the fiber random fracture model based on the global load sharing model was adopted to simulate the fatigue failure of the yarns. To improve the prediction speed of fatigue life, the number of fatigue cycles increases exponentially. The fatigue life of plain-woven SiC/SiC composites predicted with the multi-scale method are in good agreement with the experimental results. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据