4.5 Review

Revisiting Treatment Options for Depressed Patients with Generalised Anxiety Disorder

期刊

ADVANCES IN THERAPY
卷 38, 期 SUPPL 2, 页码 61-68

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01861-0

关键词

Agomelatine; Antidepressive agents; Anxiety disorders; Major depressive disorder; Serotonin uptake inhibitors

资金

  1. Servier, France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anxiety and depression often coexist, with evidence suggesting genetic basis for their comorbidity. However, current clinical classification and treatment guidelines do not fully address the specific needs of patients with anxious depression, highlighting the need for more research and tailored therapies in this area.
Symptoms of anxiety and depression often coexist, and evidence suggests that this has a genetic basis, among other possible causes. However, the current classification of comorbid generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and depression (anxious depression) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition; DSM-5) does not fully reflect the high prevalence of anxiety symptoms in people with depression and the International Classification of Diseases (10th and 11th revisions) has tended to identify anxious depression with minor disorders seen in primary care. As a result, few dedicated therapeutic trials have been conducted in patients with anxious depression, and specific treatment guidelines and recommendations are lacking. Fortunately, there is considerable therapeutic overlap between anxiety and depression, such that many agents with antidepressant efficacy are also effective for symptoms of GAD. The initial treatment of a patient with depression and symptoms of anxiety should be with an agent that is approved for both major depressive disorder and GAD, such as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. There is an obvious need for greater recognition of anxious depression in order to boost the volume of high-quality clinical data, which should translate over time into better, more specific treatment recommendations and improved outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据