4.5 Article

An investigation of the structural nonlinearity effects on the building seismic risk assessment under mainshock-aftershock sequences in Tehran metro city

期刊

ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
卷 24, 期 16, 页码 3778-3791

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/13694332211038446

关键词

aftershocks; nonlinearity; MA sequences; seismic risk; Tehran metro city

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigates the impact of neglecting nonlinear structural behavior on estimated seismic risk assessment. By modeling earthquake hazard scenarios and conducting Monte Carlo simulations, the study examines the effects of different structural responses on building performance and losses.
This research attempts to investigate the effects of neglecting the nonlinear behavior of structures on the estimated seismic risk assessment of buildings under mainshock-aftershock (MA) sequences. In this regard, the Tehran metro city is selected as a building site due to its high seismicity level. Three separate 5-, 10-, and 15-story buildings are considered and designed based on international design codes. The earthquake hazard scenarios containing mainshock-aftershock sequences are modeled randomly using a synthetic stochastic methodology for this region. Next, by implementing the Monte Carlo simulation method, buildings performances are obtained for a large number of different scenarios, and consequently, the lifetime direct losses imposed on the buildings are evaluated. To investigate the effect of structural nonlinearity, the described process is performed in two distinct scenarios: one of them assumes that the buildings behave linearly, while the other one allows the structures to respond nonlinearly. Finally, the level of dependency of calculated lifetime seismic risk to this parameter and also the contribution of different sources of losses, including physical damage, business interruption, and casualty losses, are investigated considering the aftershocks effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据