4.7 Article

Selective Synthesis of 3-(α-Fluorovinyl)indoles and 3-Acylindoles via the Cascade Reactions of 1-Phenylpyrazolidinones with α,α-Difluoromethylene Alkynes

期刊

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
卷 363, 期 14, 页码 3600-3606

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.202100441

关键词

C-H functionalization; Rodium; Heterocycles; Alkynes; Fluorine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2004189]
  2. Program for Innovative Research Team in Science and Technology in Universities of Henan Province [20IRTSTHN005]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [212300410364]
  4. Henan Key Laboratory of Organic Functional Molecules and Drug Innovation
  5. 111 Project [D17007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a selective synthesis of 3-(alpha-fluorovinyl)indoles and 3-acylindoles via a cascade process, demonstrating potential as lead compounds for drug development with controllable selectivity and simultaneous formation of diverse compounds.
Presented herein is a selective synthesis of 3-(alpha-fluorovinyl)indoles and 3-acylindoles via the coupling of 1-phenylpyrazolidinones with alpha,alpha-difluoromethylene alkynes. Mechanistically, the formation of 3-(alpha-fluorovinyl)indoles is resulted from a cascade process including Rh(III)-catalyzed ortho-C-H bond cleavage, regioselective triple bond insertion, pyrazolidinone ring-opening, indole ring-formation and HF elimination. Interestingly, when this reaction was carried out in CH3OH/H2O instead of CH3CN, the in situ formed 3-(alpha-fluorovinyl)indoles readily undergo a hydration process to afford 3-acylindole derivatives. This protocol features with controllable selectivity, simultaneous formation of both the heterocyclic scaffold and the monofluoroalkenyl moiety, atom-economy, substrate diversity, good functional group tolerance and redox-neutral reaction conditions. Anticancer screening of selected products against two human cancer cell lines demonstrated their potential as lead compounds for drug development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据