4.7 Article

Numerical simulation of a 3-D gas-solid fluidized bed: Comparison of TFM and CPFD numerical approaches and experimental validation

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 3689-3705

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2021.08.029

关键词

Fluidized bed; Numerical simulation; Computational particles fluid dynamic; Bubbles

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of the Spanish Government [ENE2016-78908-R, RTI2018-096664-B-C21]
  2. Regional Government of Castilla-La Mancha [SBPLY/17/180501/000412]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades-Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI) [RED2018-102431-T]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the results of a 3-D numerical simulation of a freely bubbling fluidized bed using the software Barracuda (CPFD-Barracuda). The results obtained from CPFD-Barracuda show satisfactory predictions of the global behavior of bubbling beds, but with some deviations in bubble sizes and velocities compared to experiments and more common numerical approaches. The sensitivity of bubble characteristics to the chosen particle fraction threshold value is also discussed, with CPFD-Barracuda showing less sensitivity compared to other methods.
This paper presents the results of a 3-D numerical simulation of a freely bubbling fluidized bed, based on the Eulerian-Lagrangian approach, using the software Barracuda (CPFD-Barracuda). The main results obtained were assessed in terms of frequency analysis, bubble pierced length, bubble size, bubble passage frequency and bubble velocity. The results obtained were also compared with experimental data obtained in a 3-D fluidized bed using pressure and optical probes, and with the numerical results using the more common Eulerian-Eulerian approach, implemented in the commercial software Fluent (TFMFluent). The results show that CPFD-Barracuda satisfactorily predicts the global behaviour of bubbling beds with a low computational cost, although it computes smaller bubble sizes and lower bubble velocities than TFM-Fluent and experiments. Additionally, the spectra of pressure and particle volume fraction obtained with CPFD-Barracuda resemble those from the experiments and the TFM-Fluent simulations, but with a larger contribution of lower frequencies. The peaks of the pressure spectra from CPFDBarracuda are close to those from the experiments and the TFM-Fluent simulations, whereas those in the solid volume spectra seem to be underestimated by CPFD-Barracuda. The results also indicate that the particle fraction threshold value chosen to distinguish bubbles contours notably influences the results of the bubble characteristics, especially for TFM-Fluent, whereas CPFD-Barracuda is less sensitive to this threshold value. (c) 2021 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据